Anastasia Gasanova vs Zoziya Kardava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Kardava and Gasanova perform on their second serve? Kardava has a slight edge, winning 38.7% of points compared to Gasanova's 36.21% over the past six months.
• When it comes to returning the second serve, Gasanova outshines Kardava, winning 57.85% of points, while Kardava manages 55.31%.
• On first serve return points, Kardava leads with 41.05% over Gasanova’s 35.94%.
• Under pressure, Gasanova saves a higher percentage of breakpoints (46.91%) compared to Kardava’s 43.92%.
• Looking at recent match records, Gasanova is ahead with an 81.33% win rate in the last year, compared to Kardava’s 56.25%.
• On their best surfaces, Kardava’s win rate on indoor hard courts is 50%, while Gasanova excels on hard courts with a 67% win rate.
• How do their tournament experiences differ? Kardava frequently plays in Futures/ITF events while Gasanova competes in more advanced Challenger/ITF events.
• The average ranking of their opponents over the past year shows Kardava has faced more highly ranked players (average rank 441.85) than Gasanova (average rank 457.56).
• In deciding sets, Gasanova is more successful, winning 74% compared to Kardava's 50% record.
• Gasanova holds a slight edge in break point conversion, with 46.12% success versus Kardava's 43.79%.

Editorial Prediction (May 7, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming match, both players bring their unique strengths to the court. Kardava demonstrates slightly better performance on their second serve point percentage, showcasing a minor advantage in this area. Additionally, Kardava performs better at returning the first serve, suggesting the potential for breaking down Gasanova's service games.

On the other hand, Gasanova has shown superior results in returning second serve points and saving breakpoints, indicating an edge in handling pressure. Furthermore, Gasanova's impressive record over the last year, with an 81.33% win rate, suggests they are on a stronger competitive trajectory than Kardava.

Considering Gasanova’s superior performance in deciding sets and their higher break-point conversion rate, they possess the elements necessary for clinching tight situations. Although Kardava has faced slightly tougher opponents on average, Gasanova’s experience at a higher competition level and superior win-loss record give her the upper hand.

Based on these comprehensive statistics, Gasanova appears to have a higher likelihood of winning this match.